Quote:
Originally Posted by woj
we are mostly on the same page, I agree with you that we should be taxed less and that our tax system should be more competitive in general...
but that's unlikely to happen anytime soon, so given that fact, shouldn't we reduce loopholes?
meaning of "owns" is debatable... lets say you work for Pfizer, and while at work at a Pfizer lab you discover a cure for cancer... who should benefit from that discovery? Legally Pfizer is entitled to that discovery... does that mean Pfizer "owns" you? do you agree with that law?
|
That is not a "law". That is the result of a private agreement (contract) entered into freely, between the scientist, and Pfizer at the time both parties voluntarily decided to trade labor for money. Utterly different.
And changes CAN happen to make taxes more competitive. It happens all the time.
.