View Single Post
Old 02-17-2015, 05:27 AM  
slapass
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L View Post
The logic of this statement is sophist. The measles and mumps can be carried by a vaccinated child who does not get sick but can still infect others. Therefore, regardless of whether a child has been vaccinated or not those viruses can still be transmitted in that population and even if 100% were inoculated some will still contract the illness. Also, your logic assumes all un vaccinated children would contract it which is not necessarily true. It is a hypothetical assumption to the point you are making.

Yes, vaccinated children will stand a higher chance of resistance so please don't think I am trying to debate that. I am just saying exposure is still imminent regardless of whether a kid is vaccinated or not and the traditional method of quarantining a kid that comes down with mumps or measles has worked fine for many many years. Also, modern medicine has seriously reduced mortality from those illnesses regardless.
Even if we agree with all of the above, the safer choice is still to vaccinate.
slapass is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote