Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink
Cost is being sited in numerous cases. But why would storage beyond a few weeks be necessary unless something major happened?
"Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake already has sounded the alarm over the long-term costs of police body cameras."
"In December, she vetoed a proposal that would have required officers to wear cameras because she didn't believe the costs and other details were adequately considered. City officials estimated costs up to $2.6 million a year for storage and the extra staff needed to manage the video data."
|
Yeah...they already do police surveillance on every city street with cams (they are everywhere here in Vegas). They don't seem to mind the cost of storage for those (hard drives are fucking cheap as hell).
But when it comes to putting them on the cops...they have a million excuses.
Always trying to cover their own asses while they act like they are ABOVE the very laws that they are supposed to enforce to "protect" us.
