Originally Posted by takethebluepill

Just sayin'...

If you read through the threads on GFY and on mainstream media, there is a fairly consistent pattern revealed.

The sentence structure, grammar and overall arguments presented by the Science Believers are generally presented in a coherent fashion and at an educated level. The anti climate change, anti vaxxers, pro conspiracy community on the other hand tend to possess non of the above. In fact, many are just one step left of joining the crazies you can find on any street corner, muttering incomprehensible mumble jumble, professing their love for Jesus, who apparently has left them to rot.

Coincidence?

Originally Posted by EonBlue

That being said, CO2 is the wrong substance to target if you are looking for clean air and a reduction in toxic waste. CO2 is not pollution and it is not toxic even at levels thousands of times higher than it is now.

Also, in most of the developed world, the air is cleaner now than it was 100 or even 40 years ago. Waterways are generally cleaner, forest cover is greater and there is just less overall pollution. All of that despite increased populations and increased use of oil and gas.