Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67
False equivalency.
recreational drug use that expands the mind and calms the nerves vs a pipeline that could have a huge impact on drinking water, and mostly puts money in the pockets of fat cats.
|
nope. valid comparison. the risks of both are undocumented. it very well may be that smoking weed causes lung cancer, etc.
at the same time, environmental impact studies have been done to show all phases of keystone, not just this last phase, are within acceptable risk statistics.
so in fact, the pipe has been shown and proven to be A-OK, while we still need to study weed A LOT more.
combined with the fact the majority of the people want both. libs get in the way of one and complain when repubs comment against the other.
typical.