Quote:
Originally Posted by NewNick
Can you see what is wrong with this ?
|
When I first saw it at a glance I was shocked yes.
When I looked closer with objectivity I saw a taller and bigger than average guy with a smaller, shorter than average model. If I was going to be disgusted by this then I'd probably want to wipe out all of the tiny / petite porn that exists which is created by producers who seem to have respect regardless.
I've seen some pretty petite models on Team Skeet's promo material too, big dicks small chicks kind of stuff, yet I don't see people crying afoul there.
Here's a promo spot
TeamSkeet - Exxxtra Small Chicks Fucking Huge Dicks Compilation! - Pornhub.com
I think many people have become lost and detached from the fact that pornography is by definition graphic, sometimes disturbing, sometimes provoking an emotive response and sometimes shocking. However this is obviously legal content from an obviously legal production outfit.
If you hark back to the Hicklin Test and ask "whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity is to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences" then this banner passes with flying colours. So from the perspective of provoking a response it's already serving it's purpose.
To that end I think the subjective response is in the eye of the beholder and going by the now outdated and conservative Hicklin Test it does what it's intended to do.