Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
so crockett, you're of the opinion that Iran should be allowed to pursue nuclear technology and acquire nuclear materials?
that's fine with you? just a yes or no is fine.
|
Where did I ever say that? We are i diplomatic talks with them to stop their weapons program.
So there are 3 options to attempt to stop them from creating a nuclear bomb.
Option 1#
Spend billions of dollars and kill thousands of people, including US solders, not to mention the fact that Iran would be the most equipped country to attack on US soil with independent operatives if we did go to war with them, that we have fought since WW2.
Destroy yet another country and breed more extremist and hope they don't attack back on our own soil with independent actors..
This is the neo cons wet dream come true breeding even more Islamist extremist in the process.. It seems to have worked so well in Iraq for example.. (/sarcasm)
Option 2#
Attempt diplomacy and gain access to their nuclear program giving us an idea of what they have and what they are capable of. This gives us UN inspections and develops more trust over time.
Option #3
Talk really sternly to them and point your finger saying we are going to blow you up if you cross this line.. Oh wait umm I meant this line over here.. wait no this line here..
This gives us no record of what they are capable off which causes more tension and distrust which will eventually lead to them saying Hey guys look at our nuclear bomb!!!
I assume this is your preferred choice of action!!
So tell us Dyno Mo.. do you prefer we start another war to "maybe" stop them.. You can't assume we would win.. or do you just want to be very mean and point your finger saying bad. bad little Mohammad..
Obviously you don't seem to care for the option of diplomacy so you must be in one of the other 2 camps.. Which one is it?