Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
assumed widespread forced prostitution may be understood as women adapting in your country, it's not here. fucking new female cfo of google just got a $70 million pay deal and i'm supposed to buy into the bullshit argument? please.
especially when it comes to trying to legislate something so fucking stupid.
nevertheless, you are making a tangential point.
back to my main point. you really think it's smart to enact legislation to make climate change a fucking gender issue favoring women?
|
Was that congresswoman talking about US solely? If so, either he thinks or US is so called less developed country. I though he was talking about the impact on women at global scale.
I don't know about that legislation thing. I only read the quote you posted and it just basically says that the impact on women has to be examined more closely.
"encourages the use of gender-sensitive frameworks in
developing policies to address climate change, which account
for the specific impacts of climate change on women; "
I know that US folks are quite US centric folks, but come on. The whole world now?
"Lee introduced House Concurrent Resolution 29, warning that women will be forced into “transactional sex” to get enough food and clean water — all because global warming will create “conflict and instability” in the world."
CA Dem Warns Global Warming Will Make Women Prostitutes