Quote:
Originally Posted by Jel
by the pompous? assuming they don't bait and switch, the surfer ultimately ends up where he wants to go, just at the expense of 1 click. How is that any different from what a 'clean' affiliate does? Both do whatever it takes to get SE traffic, and ultimately leech off google (and to a lesser extent yahoo/bing).
like... How are tube spammers any different to affiliates with twitter accounts? Both are leeching from the internal and external traffic of eg xhamster and twitter. Aside from a few traffic powerhouses like the tubes, and a handful of tgps and blogs, the rest are leeching in one way or another, be it traffic or authority. So why do some cast their eyes down on 'spammers' as if their work is any less moral/clean/fill in the blank?
For that matter, how are tube 'spammers' any different to paysites who submit to tubes?
What's your take - dirty leeching scum, or a different side of the same coin?
|
Two people competing for the same resource ...
One launches a propaganda campaign to make the other feel bad, look bad etc..., then, if that perception is adopted by everyone, you have an army on your side against your enemy and can take the resource for yourself.
Google does it all the time. All companies/politicians do it all the time.