View Single Post
Old 04-03-2015, 05:11 PM  
Due
Confirmed User
 
Due's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 3,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesouth View Post
After reading the verdict it is apparent that the judge decided that chasing copyright infringers was the main business NOT producing content...very much like patent trolls. I too come down on the side of copyright owners but this case raises some questions...like why isnt it ok to make more money from copyright violations than from producing content? Admitted we dont want companies doing this left and right and clogging up the courts but a few cases with big verdicts for infringement and these start going away.

interesting decision
The DMCA notifications they sent purposely lacked information needed to identify the content in question. The law is very clear about what a dmca notification should include, if any information is missing you can legally ignore it.
__________________
I buy plugs
Skype: Due_Global
/Due
Due is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote