Quote:
Originally Posted by aka123
Usually it is considered whether it was accident or not. Hunting men with a car or speeding and accidentally hitting someone aren't exactly the same things.
|
Since you still do not understand simple things, let me lay out another analogy.
So we established that robbing empty house gets you softer sentence than invading house with people.
You claim that it should not be so because it is "accident" weather you invade empty or full house.
My analogy:
Imagine perp 1 and perp 2.
Both robs a liquor store. Both decides to shoot attendant in the leg. One aims at a leg and shoots it, another aims at a leg and misses and kills the guy accidently.
Would you claim that both should be sentenced the same way because it was just accident that one was a bad shooter and missed? No? So same with the houses - if you were bad at planning empty house and accidently got full house - you get harsher sentence for home invasion instead of for robbing empty house.
How is that difficult to grasp?