Quote:
Originally Posted by takethebluepill
Uh huh...better take a look on NASA's official site, and not the regurgitated 'interpretation' of NASA's data. 2 very different things.
At least now I know who buys loafers at the shoe store. Many of you are obviously too dull to know how to tie your own laces.
|
Another anonymous guy on a porn message board who thinks he's smarter than the rest of us.
How shocking and unexpected.
EVERYTHING that is posted on both "sides" is "regurgitated" info to prop up people's stance.
YOU on the other hand...trying to insult my intelligence without even knowing me tells me all I need to know about you.
But since you are a science professor like mark prince is...why don't you show us all the NASA data and then "explain" it to us.
You know...it wasn't that long ago that the alarmists (such as yourself) were discounting NASA's findings because they didn't show what they wanted it too.
Just like they ignore meteorologists and any scientist who doesn't agree with them.
But now the alarmists want to use NASA to "prove" themselves right...that is until NASA finds things that don't fit the agenda.
Again...the stupidity is awesome! Forget Earth's history. Forget how many times now that the alarmists have been WRONG (starting in 1970 when Pres. Nixon was given a scientific report claiming that if something was not done right then...the entire East Coast would be underwater by the year 2000...lol)