View Single Post
Old 05-26-2015, 06:39 PM  
ITraffic
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer View Post
Men and women are not measured and evaluated in the same way by each other. Not even close. A woman has to have a nice body, nice hips/ass, nice tits, (ratios play a huge role) nice face, where again symmetry and specific spatial relationships are evaluated... all signs of great genes and a high probability of healthy offspring which will have a higher probability of survival, as will the mother, not be past menopause (which has physical cues) etc... a guy has to be able to fight, hunt, defend, lead, protect etc.

(talking about millions of years of evolutionary biology and the programs still running in our brains, not about last weekend and that dude that banged some chick)
i knew you would say that. but what is considered "symmetrical" and "proportional" and "naturally attractive" is bound by culture and history and anyone who would have had a wide and varied and education in history, art history, literature and science instead or reading some pop books on evolutionary psychology would know and understand that.
ITraffic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote