Jscott, you are a good man!
Our dealing and chat have always been fair and courteous. You have my utmost respect in this business.
I still do not see in this case though why the host should lower their demands.
You used their services from March and onwards.
No one paid for that time, yet they were nice enough to let it continue.
Why, give just one reason, as to why they should let you get away with not paying for the services you have used?
Your argument "better a little than nothing at all" is weak. If they are fairly big, then settling for say $150 on a $600 bill (25% of whatever) or around that sum, is not worth it to a company above a certain size. They'd rather take the chance of perhaps getting the $600 or nothing at all. $150 is to little to make a difference, plus it sets an example.
If the sites hold value, which I belive, I rarely see you buying bad stuff, man up and bite the sour apple and pay the host. After all, you have used their services, haven't you?
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The truth is not affected by the beliefs, or doubts, of the majority.
|