View Single Post
Old 06-22-2015, 07:18 AM  
Shap
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jel View Post
I'd say you will get a shitton of half-baked ideas, crappy sites, biz-less businesses peppering your site with garbage, that would truly be a waste of time to review/critique. No different than any other 80/20 rule, but I'd guess it'll become very tiresome/mundane after a while, and you'll be forced to wade through the crap and giving feedback on every minute detail, in order to get to the worthwhile ones that show/have promise.

As it goes on, it'll seem the ones you are now bored with you are just ignoring (which most likely you will be), and create the image of disinterest by the owner to the audience. That leads to inactivity which obviously leads to death.

It might not go like that at all of course, and there'll always be a thousand reasons of 'why not', people are always quick to see the negatives and point them out, so take this post as trying to maybe point out a pitfall, and not as a 'don't do it' (which I'm sure you will anyway having been where you have been and heard all the naysaying before)

GL
Good points. But what if it's not limited to what is submitted. What about commenting on things that would help people who aren't submitting?
i.e. stuff like this
- thoughts on what I would do if I owned FreeOnes.
- discussion on top 15 videos on tube site A and what they are doing that you can learn from
- what design changes I would make if I owned Twistys.com today.

Stuff like that.
Shap is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote