Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
Too bad some of the people attending church were not armed -- less people would have died.
That asshole would have used a suicide belt or a truck bomb if he new he would be shot on sight 
People that want to kill can kill. Guns or not. Be like ISIS use a sword ... Against unarmed people he may have killed a few ... |
Your argument is counter productive as it shows that with out access to truck bombs in the US no one uses them..
Think about it, in the last 20 or 30 years what has there been 2 or 3 truck bombings? The Oklahoma federal building and the first attack on the WTC is all I can think of.
Why is that? Why because it's kinda difficult to get the materials for the average person. Yet as we see in the middle east they are very common because it's very easy to get the explosives there.
Now think about that for a moment.. if there weren't so many guns and such easy access to tgem..then we wouldn't see gun related crimes like we do because people wouldn't have easy access to them..
Yes if they were determined they could still kill people, it just wouldnt be with guns.. maybe the popular thing would be to run people over with trucks or something.
Now b4 you get all, you wanna take ma guns away, that's not what I'm saying. I realize the genie is out of the bottle and it's likely impossible problem to fix but I just wanted to show that your argument wasn't really valid.