sexeducation:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"What qualifications do you have to provide *ANY* from of sex education?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have the same qualifications that ALL Mothers & ALL Fathers have.
|
OK.. why don't you simply say that you have NO QUALIFICATION?
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Also... What does the education of parents have to do with, for example, images of adults involved in anal sex with children ?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are NO images of children having sex on my websites!
Except for some banners (which the current is being replaced) and swoit.com graphics and some clipart - there are no graphics on my website - at all.
|
True.. there are "no images of children having sex on my websites" - NOW!
BUT THERE *WERE* IMAGES OF ADULTS INVOLVED IN ANAL SEX WITH CHILDREN and related sick imaging on your "website".
How do I know? Because I have copies of your complete website before it was pulled. It may come as a surprise to you that others have been looking at your website for many months and already have copies of your "content" plus a considerable amount of further related information. There is NO QUESTION that this is CHILD PORN.
Quote:
|
Webby - would SexEducation.com as a UBB board be more acceptable to you?
|
You have SERIOUSLY GOT TO BE JOKING!!!
OR, you just don't get any of the threads that have been posted here. Try reading the follow twice:
What is "acceptable" to me is totally irrelevant, - I have nothing to do with your "website" and have no qualification - the same as you, - to engage in giving "opinions" in this area.
SexEducation.com is a totally messed up domain currently the subject of several avenues of inquiry by several law enforcement agencies. These people are in no hurry to speak to you - it's called "research" - there are avenues still partially investigated, and, to use a quote, "Mr 'Beacock' is not going anywhere...".
Under these circumstances there is little doubt that you would need to raise considerable amounts of cash to pay *anyone* to take control of your "websites". They are not even worth the $10 registration fee. They are totally contaminated.
Quote:
|
Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain?
|
Why do you repeat this question parrot fashion? This is not any legal term and is not any guideline for any websites. "Opinions" don't matter since juries and judges will determine guidelines, together with exisiting laws and precedents. YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE and you admit you have not been provided with this.
Therefore, your "opinion" on this phrase above and the opinions of others is not relevant. This is not a "legal discussion board" - that's what lawyers are for.
FINALLY, - YOU HAVE NO QUALIFICATION TO OFFER ANY "OPINONS" EITHER WITHIN THE ADULT INDUSTRY OR RELATED TO SEX EDUCATION. YOU HAVE ALREADY MESSED UP TIME AND TIME AGAIN - IN FACT YOU ARE A LIABILITY.
Now...
