Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
You see, this is the kind of stupid shit I'm referring to. People don't buy "military firearms" for hunting in the first place. As far as I know, that would be illegal in most States because "military firearms" & "assault rifles" are fully automatic.
Just because you feel like calling a gun something it clearly is not does not make you correct. A "short barreled hunting gun" is no different than a short barreled AR-10 with a 5 round magazine. YOUR chosen definition of "hunting gun" is based on what exactly? That the stock isn't adjustable? That it's not semi auto? That it's not black? That it doesn't accept magazines? All those scary things make it a "military gun" to you?
Seriously, you're not making any sense here.
|
Seriously and seriously? You take military firearm, mod it as semi-auto only and you think it is not military firearm anymore? It is the same fucking gun without full-auto capability, that can be suppressed even in guns possessed by military (like forced burst fire). You can call it whatever you want in there, in Somalia they have different legal definitions, and here in Finland again different definitions, so let's stay focused into those guns, not to the legal stuff.
My definition for hunting gun is a gun that is designed for hunting, or in broader terms for sport shooting too if such gun is used for hunting.
I have been in army and I can say that army's guns clearly differ from guns designed for hunting or sport shooting, especially when it comes to rifles. Guns are tailored for certain purposes. There aren't just guns; there are guns designed for specific situations and purposes.