Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
all this talk about brands. it's over-emphasized. obviously this is not and was not a branding effort.
and i don't think it's accurate to assume his style would be detrimental to the USA. while i tend to agree, i am reminded of RR's "we begin bombing in 5 minutes", the fact that BO is considered weak by foreign leaders, putin, terrorists, etc. i can't sit here and claim i know his style would be bad for America for certain. Moreover, his style is quintessential AMerican. that's what we do, we talk loud and carry a big gun.
it's not like USA foreign policy is a shiny beacon of how to do it right.
|
He's already pissed off most of Mexico and their govt..
You can call Obama weak all you want, but it certainly wasn't George Bush whom gave the order to go after bin laden or to hit the Taliban in Pakastain. Where Bush allowed them to hide untouched..
I don't care what someone else thinks someone looks like, it's about the actions, not appearance. bush talked tough and then allowed bin laden to sit hidden away and allowed the Taliban to attack our troops and hide in Pakistan untouched. Obama didn't.. So whom had the better policy?
Obama did what had to be done, Bush talked a lot about doing it...