|
it's that yahoo link that won't load... I just tried again and it froze me up like a motherfucker. It still only referenced her 'easy on the eye [playing style] and good looks' so like I say meh, that isn't ill-intentioned.
Then it mentioned how the original piece mentions some other off field activities like books she has written - so? Do any of these people watch football? Do they know about the filler stuff, background stuff on players, teams, places of origin, history and factoids about cup venues, etc?
I can be a true sexist prick when the mood takes me (ie when I'm in a miscievuous, or just in a wanky mood if a woman has pissed me off), and from what I've seen so far, this doesn't even come close to real and/or harmful sexism.
In fact I'll be a sexist prick now, just for the fun of it, and wonder out loud if the original complainants were due their period to get so worked up about essentially, nothing. I just can't see the fuss (from what little I've read, and the lack of actual 'sexist' examples from the original piece).
And yeah that's good advice... though not pointing out when time/effort is wasted on nothing, when it could be better spent on REAL injustice(s), is just as important to me, so that we don't end up in a world where it *does* become a case of head for the hills sons, no longer can you appreciate that azz...
|