View Single Post
Old 07-14-2015, 11:54 AM  
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 63,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
Yes, actually it DOES show they are smart. More than half of a politicians job is picking people to be involved in crafting their messaging. The guy who picks great people and crafts a great message IS doing the job well. The guy who doesn't is not doing his job well.

Presidents (all of them) know less than 1% of what they would need to know to operate the country. Smart ones are the ones who pick people who do know the specifics of the role they are intended to fill. You don't want a President who knows everything... you want one who picks the right people who each know the specific things they need to know about what they are asked to do.

Bush picked an idiot to run FEMA and it was tragic when Hurricane Katrina happened. He also had some terrible speech writers (that's his fault more than theirs). Bill Clinton had some excellent writers. Being able to see the difference and do the hiring is important.
i could point to BO's writing team as a counterpoint, but your argument is trying to claim that Jon Stewart is smart/worthy of being president of the USA because he makes awesome jokes isn't really something i'm up for debating.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote