07-19-2003, 07:10 AM
|
|
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada
Posts: 7,315
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OzMedia
I think, if you took the time to learn English, that the question you really want to pose is.. "Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be shown on any freely accessible web site ?"
|
No - wrong. Your question could turn into an arguement of "free speech" and such ...
My question does not.
It deals with ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name - and the rights of the child to reasonable access to the information age. And we all know the answer to the question - and that it does not occur currently - and that it should occur.
Quote:
|
Domain names are irrelevant to this question because one might draw the conclusion, from the poor phrasing of your question, the you wouldn't mind that such things were shown on a web site merely accessible with an IP address.
|
Domain names are "the question".
Quote:
|
It seems to me, after watching the pages of this thread grow in number daily, that you are just an attention seeking mis-fit who enjoys throwing stones. Unfortunately for you, as the old saying goes, those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
|
fluff and fodder
Quote:
|
The answer to your question, the question to which you obviously crave a response, is all around you. It is blindingly obvious that almost anyone in this industry who runs an adult website does believe that it is acceptable to show "aroused genitals", aka stiff cocks, and "reproductive bodily fluids", aka cum, on freely accesible web sites.
|
The question is not about the right to publish adult content on any page. The question is about ONE PAGE - just one page - the directly accessed domain name. A page that web browsers could check - a page that content filtering software could check. One page - not subpages - not subdirectories - ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name.
Quote:
|
The question you may pose is why ? I think, this is only a matter of opinion, that the reason why this is acceptable is that the Internet is not a place for unsupervised children. It is a network operating in the adult world, as such care must be taken when exposing children to it. Although, I qualify my opinion by stating that it is not acceptible practice to mislead children into accessing such web sites. Adult and General Viewing sites can co-exist on the same network if each site only seeks to draw it's own specific audience.
|
I believe that both can exist on the same network - and should - as well. But there must be some overlap of consensus. Let's start with ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name. When driving down the information superhighway - all children traveling that road - shouldn't have to keep the eyes shut. It is not an unreasonable restriction to freedom of the press to require ONE PAGE be rated and/or not contain reproductive bodily fluids or aroused genitals.
Quote:
|
In your case it is not acceptable to promote SWOIT sites your site if you claim your website as a site for sex education, which implies general viewing.
|
Trust me ... I understand the difficulties of appropriateness regarding a domain name that has BOTH "sex" and "education" contained generically in it.
My directly accessed domain name contains a meta tag with the highest content rating possible by ICRA.ORG. It's graphics will once again - gradually increase in "adultness". The website allows graphics to be turned off, articles to be blocked, videos to be blocked, advertising to be blocked and more. SexEducation.com contains the worlds most advanced content controls ABOVE AND BEYOND anything that I am aware of legally. AND I did not do that because of any website shut down - I did that out of respect for the internet/public.
Quote:
|
This is where your argument crumples into a heap. You express a desire to campaign for what you percieve to be sexual liberation and education , yet at the same time you promote the very sites you seek to oppose.
|
Wrong. Adult websites (pornography) have a right to exist and do provide a valuable source of information in the information age. In the history of the world, there has never been this much sexual content available to the public - and it is providing valuable information for sexual research.
AND - pornography provides entertainment for adults.
However, the adult industry has failed to return value to the industry to which it has raped.
Pornography is not representative of how people have partner sex. It is just FANTASY masturbation material.
AND - when you take a look at the historical examples of societies that begin to get television (broadband internet really) - and the "what we see is what we want" demand for consumer products caused by television in an emerging nation - we have the direct evidence of the long term affects of this freely available pornography.
So lets start - ALL OF US - with one page - where we all can agree - JUST ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name.
Can we do the right thing on one page?
I say yes...
I say - we have to.
Quote:
|
I would go on, expand my thoughts in more depth, however from my reading in recent days it appears that the keystrokes would be lost on you.
|
LOL ... |
|
|