Quote:
Originally Posted by aka123
Yeah, but network like that is probably more or less shit and that is when the negative effects of interlinking start. It just screams about artificial linking. And even if Google would count the links as a positive thing, the value will be fucking low.
But if you maintain 50-100 quality websites, you have.. hands full of work, that is for sure.
I wouldn't create network like that.
|
You can do spun text from rss feeds, at the rate of at least 200 posts a day, if needed. Then get some kind of links to these sites, I am not sure. With this, people say it is not good, don't do it, but if you would be able to take a look at all the links to adult websites, something like this could be at 20 or more percent, lets say. People say it is this, and that, it is not natural, so I would not do it, but a lot of links is like this, or paid, or 100+ links on the bottom of a high PR site, and it works. I don't specialize in seo, so I am not sure. I would need to work on it full time / every day.
Natural links / Google Webmaster Guidelines - this describes a perfect state of things, and what is wanted by them. What is actually out there is far away from this, and they have to work with that...