Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
No you haven't you ignorant retard. It's just not worth arguing with you because you are too delusional and have zero ability to understand fucki g basic common sense..
It's like you trying to argue about the battery post I made wasn't a breakthrough because it might be expensive. You are seriously too ignorant to understand the basic concept, that new tech is almost always rare and expensive at first.
When nicad batteries were first put on the market, they were expensive and only used on high end or very specific items. Now they are common place.
You have to be a fucking fool to not understand this.. Your right wing radio has rotted the remaining brain cells the alcohol didn't already get..
|
i'll take this as your declining my offer of an opportunity presented to you.
regardless.
because you also are twisting my posts. a "breakthrough" in the laboratory in principle, is a minimum of 10 years away from application and closer to 20+.
that has nothing to do with expense.
it's the time factor to PROVE the chemistry. it's extremely complex testing and time-consuming. the blurb i quoted certainly included the expense but the point of the blurb was the fact that it's at least 10 years away from reality.
i didn't think i had to explain that to you, based on your claiming you know what the fuck you're talking about. because anyone that's following battery technology and such, is fully aware of the time constraints in proving a viable SAFE battery for the masses. this is rocket science.