Quote:
Originally Posted by Shap
You've made many bold comments here indicating how nobody here is doing it right and how you know how to do it better. So logically the next question is how do we get you in the space/place where you've created that next big thing. In my opinion that's an interesting discussion. Dare I say that is an even more interesting conversation than a debate to whether metart content is great or not.
|
Actually logically the next question would be, how do you propose people do it better, why do you think this site has failed, why is this one a success, finding out what makes me have such a strong opinion on something that you disagree with to see the other side. Only asking when you can make room for the next big thing sounds condescending. perhaps ill use your method in further conversations on here and show you the results ;)
I want to deeper into this conversation regarding what is quality and why some are missing the easy steps that allow a company to grow in 2015, however you seem to not respond to anything regarding the topic at hand and you seem to be listening and not giving your own personal input.
Ill attempt to anyway..
How many sites have been successful in the past 5 years? Grew to become large (to be more specific). I assume you think its just hard to reach that level and the ones doing it have something others dont? Are they lucky? Whats your opinion on what separates them? well lets compare ones that have fallen short vs ones that have reached success. We could compare the differences.
If you think people have been doing it right, which is what you implied when you suggested my remarks as bold, then i would be interested in some lists from you so I can show you that its not exactly a bold remark