View Single Post
Old 08-31-2015, 09:56 AM  
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Yeah, it's pretty dumb.

Especially since everyone is different. I know when I was in High School, my best friend had a full chest of hair and a full beard at age 14.
Other guys I knew were still just barely reaching puberty at 17. (And I still haven't reached maturity lol)

But I suppose the law has to have some kind of ability to differentiate adults from minors.
It's just funny to hear that a 15 year old Traci Lords was a "child". I did not know her, and never met her...but I would guess that a 15 year old Traci Lords was a full grown woman and had more savvy and street smarts than some women twice her age at the time.

But legally? She was under the age to shoot porn.

Is it "child porn"? In her case I don't think it was...but in order to keep all 15 year olds safe and not being taken advantage of...yes, we need to have that 18 years old "line in the sand" to shoot adult pics or vids.
i absolutely agree, 18 is the minimum age, i'd even be ok with 21 if the industry would decide on that

but "cp" is prepubescent children, 17 is under the legal age for porn but if i call a fully developed 17 year old pretty, i am not a pervert

that i would never shoot her - because it is not legal - is something different

but a pedophile is not interested in 17 year olds
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote