Quote:
Originally Posted by rogueteens
Totally unrelated to the argument at hand. those children were evacuated and it happened all over Europe, they were not refugees and their parents were left behind to help with the war effort. the children returned after the danger was over. totally unlike what is happening now. contrary to what the media tells you, almost all of the migrants are young men looking for an easier life and most of them are up to 1000 miles away from the war they claim to be escaping from but still want to push on westwards. Its a myth that all of those so-called asylum seekers are actually genuine refugees. yes, some are but by far, they are mostly economic migrants.
|
I don't think that you really got my post.
Our media has told that most arriving refugees are men because the others can't stand the long and hard journey. You know; family escapes to Turkey for example, and then their able bodied men leaves to Europe after better life. At least we are told that most/ big part of refugees are actually women and kids, they just don't come to Europe. But anyways, the end result is that they have already escaped the war when they start their journey to Europe.
The easy solution to still taking refugees would be following: If you are escaping something, then is the thing you escape at in the country you come from? Like if you cross border, is the country on the side you are coming from the country where are the things you escape for. If not, then there is no need/ valid reason to cross border.
AKA we would take refugees pretty much only from neighboring countries. It is easy to return back and the refugees are more close culturally, etc. than the citizens of that country. So, easier for everyone. Familiar, fun and easy to return.