Quote:
Originally Posted by $5 submissions
Interesting. So the conflict that you see is this: She agreed to take on a job involving the LAW of the land. IMPLICIT in this is the KNOWLEDGE that the LAW CHANGES per interpretation of the courts. ALso implicit is the AGREEMENT to accept such changes.
Did i get that right?
|
Basically, yes. When taking office she swore to uphold the law. Laws change and in this case she doesn't agree with the change so she refuses to uphold it.