Originally Posted by klinton

in that particular case - it would be better to keep Saddam, Gaddafi(France,Italy) and Assad...at least their countries were functioning properly, were not ruined, had everything that their citizens would need (healthcare, safety, roads, infrastructure, education and so on - for the price of freedom) and actually people were living normal life over there - for the price of their so called "democratic' freedoms.
now you have "democracy" in Libya and Iraq and you see and now know how "democracy" looks for Arabs. some people are just not good for that type of government. your government didnt know that? oh come on.
unfortunately this is how your foreign policy looks for the others since ~50 years - "grab what is valuable, leave mess and shit and go away to safe haven at the other side of Atlantic"