Originally Posted by Joshua G

first, the article is limited only to WSJ subscribers, is unreadable to the general public. second, california has had its own pollution standards far longer than the last 20 years, so why is the smog better only for 20 years, when CA has had CARB since the 60s. does the article tie volkswagen directly to LA smog levels? probably not.

still waiting for 1 liberal to state the actual harm to any ecosystem, person or animal due to VW's "violation". What is the specific benefit of the EPA NOx level to anyone or anything? please stop avoiding this ive only asked 3 times, twice directly to people, who deflect. TCLgirls prefers to debate the idea of driving a faster car as a right. avoids my question like the plague. at least this post was an honest attempt to answer it. but even that article does not tie VW to any harm to anything.