Quote:
Originally Posted by takethebluepill
So let me get this straight. BBC news, a company with more lawyers then a circus vw filled with clowns, very likely passes this story through aforementioned army of lawyers to make sure that they are not opening themselves up to a defamation suit or other legal action. Then, satisfied that this story passes legal muster, publishes this story that points the finger directly at Sex Messenger.
But, the representatives from Sex Messenger post on GFY that it is not them. I don't know. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...well you know...
|
Probably since this is about a porn site the BBC don't even cared to ask the lawyer or check themselves. They assume porn sites are all illegal guys in first place who can't sue anyone.