Quote:
Originally Posted by xXXtesy10
so what? you are not police now go fuck yourself  |
So would you rather that they did nothing?
Just let ad-buyers fill their system with malware, have it spread across all their publishers site to the end user?
Or would you rather that they take the responsibility to keep their system as clean as possible of malware ads?
After all, it is not only up to each ad network to do what they can to keep their system as clean as possible of malware, but also their responsibility to the publishing sites and to not cause harm to the publishers end-user base.
The only people I can see that would be upset by ad networks putting time, energy, resources and money into this would be those trying to benefit from malware. As they are the only ones negatively impacted by networks trying to keep malware from spreading out of their system.
As to the point of who elected them (or any ad network), nobody had to, after all it is their system to protect.
I'd be more worried about the networks that do not do such checks, than the ones that do.