10-03-2015, 08:45 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: California
Posts: 3,068
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
1: The school policy kept the security unarmed.
2: When the people carrying are nowhere near the action, how the fuck does your point stand up? It doesn't.
|
Because the shooter has no way of determining which students were carrying, and where any of those ccp holders would be on campus at any particular time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
I happened to be in Oregon when this went down....AND I had a gun on me. Why didn't I even try to stop this shit from happening? Oh yeah, because I wasn't in the room with the gunman...and neither were any of the others who were armed and on campus. BUT, had the campus had a less Nazi like policy, others who could have made a difference may have done so.
|
All that is irrelevant, because like I said above, the shooter does not know who is carrying on campus. I am not arguing that any ccp holder should have stopped the shooter. I am questioning the rationale, often put forth by gun advocates, that shooters will avoid areas where guns are allowed for fear of being shot at. |
|
|