Quote:
Originally Posted by klinton
the employment stats that you posted are sign of the times and they have nothing to do if the company is in US or not. it's just like that - there will be less and less jobs for people as many things got automated.
anyway - the corporations that I posted are US based, they were invented by US guys,developed over there and from there conquered whole world (without bombs)- and that means a lot, dont you think ?
now, find me a hooker in US for 30 bucks/ hour or nurse for 5 usd/ hour...just like you may find in Serbia...
btw. is writing about US your idea fixe ? your Holy Graal ? maybe its not that healthy, you know ?
|
its not a sign of the times, employing people for less $$ will always be popular...this is bad for 1st world people...
I am not arguing that the owners of the corporations did not get a good deal or that they are not leaders in the market, I am arguing that these companies are there to make money- for themselves- and not the USA...it is not by chance that the 100K jobs you posted above are dwarfed by the number of jobs outside the USA...these companies were founded in the USA but the shareholders want max profit so the corps go china...all future development is planned in china, the shareholders do not give a shit about US jobs...the suicide nets at apples plant in china paints a clear picture what it takes to be a "winner"
you speak of these corporations like they are some sort of US asset when in fact they are in game for themselves only and not you guys...you speak as though it is their plan to employ america when it is obviously not...
what exactly will americans do in 20 years? you will produce nothing, be the empire of nothing, and you will rely on "service economy" even though it is prone to the same f/laws as production economy= pay workers less-----> succeed more...
I am not worrying about the USA why do you think this? Just bored and trolling with some legit questions ect...nothing wrong with a weekend poke to relieve the boredom
