Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
|
Do yıu have anything to say about destructions and killings caused by radical islamists?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
RT and Sputnik are always truth LMAO.
I hardly think that Aljazeera is western media propaganda ... In fact they are generally anti-western. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has been proven to be reliable -- they first reported the Assad government's use of chemical weapons in the field and it's indiscriminate attacks with barrel bombs dropped from helicopters in civilian areas. Attacks with these chemical weapons are a Geneva convention violation and now the Russians, Iranians and Hezbollah are propping up their tool the 'Devil of Damascus' => Bashar Assad. Saddam controlled his population's rogue elements the same way by using nerve gas. Hafez al-Assad 1982 Hama Islamic uprising , the former president, and Bashar's father, of Syria was a ruthless animal. He was allied with the old Soviet Union where Putin cut his teeth in the KGB.
Meantime, Putin has a new issue. 36,000 NATO troops will be busy on his western border for the largest NATO military exercises in 13 years for a few months -- Merry Christmas! Let him turn red in the face and spit. This looks to me like another Vietnam all over again -- It looks like a long winter ...
Russia is buried in their own doings ... The Russians have everything to lose and little to gain by their actions in Ukraine and Syria. I had hoped they were smarter than that. The US really has nothing to show from it's aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan except a $3 trillion dollar war cost, near economic collapse the maiming and deaths of thousands of its servicemen and the maiming and deaths of hundreds of thousands Iraqis and Afghans -- it was a lose-lose game and the Russians are walking into the same sort of mess the warned the USA of in 2003, ironic ...
When the bombs and hostage situations go off again in your Muslim dominated provinces you should know why. |
Here on gfy i saw many ignorants with big mouth talked about the things that they are unaware of, but you suppose to be great example of being clown with your way of ignorance.
firstly, in 1982 the hama uprizing was launched by Muslim brotherhood, they killled Nusayri/alavite doctor and military school students, so it was an extremist terrorism counter attacked by Syrian army and ended ended up by destruction of city of hama.
on the otherhand an other thinks that showed you cluless was Saddam and Bashar asad draw differant profiles with differant personallity.
unlike Saddam, he is an aphtalmologist doctor worked in London, he speaks fluent English and has European style of modern cloding, he expected to cause huge changes in syria about modernisation and catching up the today's World.
indeed he has done some, durring his rule internet became way more poppuler, he opened up friendlier relationships with western countries and liberalization of markets followed (though which caused harm more than good), but hopefully now his country is paying charge of supporting hezbollah against Israel durring the 2006 israeli-Lebanese war.
lastly, for the use of chemical gas claims, proofs mostly points out to the so called opposing front (islamists) though WHO really it was unknown.