11-10-2015, 05:33 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: California
Posts: 3,068
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
i know that. i was paraphrasing.
facts:
1. the players were walking out due to the chancellor's lack of action they felt proper.
2. the coaches smartly acted in solidarity with those players.
3. you exclaimed the coaches supported (implication: agreed with) the players.
conclusion: your view is {paraphrased} the coaches supported the players re: their view of the chancellor.
|
You're just jumping to conclusions regarding the reasons for my statement that the coaches supported the players. There could be other reasons why the coaches supported the players. They could be supporting the players because they don't want to forfeit future games (lose money). Or maybe they supported the players because they don't want to lose/turn-off black future recruits. Or it could be a combination of numerous reasons. I have never excluded any possible reason. |
|
|