View Single Post
Old 11-16-2015, 02:39 PM  
AmeliaG
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AmeliaG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmycooper View Post
The presumption was implicit in the accusatory nature of your response. But whatever.

The study is not finished yet but it started i think in 2010 and there have been no transmissions last i checked. When it started, undetectable was viral load <500ml. Since then, testing has become more sensitive so undetectable = < 20ml. The study continues to be done at <500. Testing is done unprotected. Both gay and straight couples. So unless something drastically changes before the end of the study in 2017, which it wont, i would say 99.99% for unprotected anal if giver is on meds with a vl < 20 and much closer to 100% if protected vaginal.
There is no reason for you to get all butthurt about the obvious question raised by your extreme assertion that unprotected sex with HIV patients is totally fine.

Link to incomplete study upon which you base your passionate but totally not personal beliefs about HIV transmission?
__________________
GFY Hall of Famer

AltStar Hall of Famer




Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

Babe photography portfolio
AmeliaG is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote