Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio
I am not blaming libertarians for the current state of events, they were never in power so it would be silly to argue this...what I am addressing is the hypocrisy of calling oneself libertarian whilst contemplating banning others from doing exactly what you guys did: immigrate...I would understand it if the native americans had such a stance but immigrants to complain about other immigrants fleeing from US started wars and economic terrorism? hypocritical to say the least...
it is nice that libertarians do not believe in flat our terrorism, that you call foreign intervention...but your country (the other 2 parties) kinda created alqaeda, saddam, put khomeini in power, supplied ISIS with weapons and cash, toppled governments left and right ect ect...closing your borders to people who run from your violence makes you, for a lack of a better term: klingons
it is the USA that should be taking in all the refugees...it created the mess...
|
Did you read the article? Or my perspective? I said that it was interesting, and that I tended to lean towards totally open borders. . The article talks about decentralizing control of them, not banning immigration altogether.
P.s. This mess started after the British and French brought down the Ottoman Empire and tried to create made-up nations by drawing artificial lines without regard to tribal or regional boundaries, so it is not all the fault of the US. Terrorism and massacres began in the 1920s.
.