Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
To clear up any mistakes, research first. We have to get lucky every time, they need only get lucky 1-10 times.
It's a case of trusting the Government or making it harder for them to protect us. The debate then is over the people elected to be in Government. And that's our responsibility.
|
That's exactly the point I was making ie most people are like you and are so completely indoctrinated that they believe all the propaganda. Often, they don't receive their news from sources outside mainstream media.
These measures do absolutely nothing (and it has been proven) to deter or reduce or prevent terrorism. SWIFT is for wire transactions and terrorism doesn't even utilize it much and where it does, they will just switch. This isn't about terrorism at all, its about taxation and monitoring transactions and as was posted previously, with the banning of cash coming into play all payments ultimately becoming electronic.
https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...-ban-cash.html
It's all a part of the same whole and will do nothing to make us safer but will do everything to increase our enslavement. I use the example of surveillance and loss of privacy because that's the major curb we now endure:
https://reason.com/archives/2015/01/...-and-terrorism
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/18/op...rism.html?_r=0
Snowden: Mass surveillance won’t stop terrorism | New York Post
https://www.newamerica.org/internati...op-terrorists/