Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
There's no censorship going on at all. A payment processors policies are their own, and what they will process and not process for is their decision. "referencing under age porn and beastiality" is completely understood and respected from every legit porn producer, actor and webmaster out there.
|
the entire banking/international econ system needs to be torn apart with a rusty pickaxe and rebuilt from the bottom up, but it the interests of staying on topic not gonna venture into that morass
that said, private companies like banks and cc cos absolutely do practise censorship, in that as of right now it's almost impossible to operate a successful site without acquiescing to the strictures they impose. The recent thread about a proposed btc site made that evident. No cc processing=no viable business, in the current marketplace at least
Some of their rules are flat out fuckery. Case in point: lactation. In the US at least that's considered a BRAM violation. The ban on menstrual blood or pee I can at least see a quasi logical basis for, in that both are technically waste products, but breast milk is
actual food. It's crazy to me that a guy can shoot cum all over another person and it's fine but a hint of breast milk? That's obscene
I get it, BRAM constraints are a far better alternative to a wildwest where cp and brutality are permitted to thrive openly, but let's not pretend that a small handful of private enterprises aren't in almost total control of the commercial market. They are, and their rules in practise are absolutely censorious.