Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L
If she had a safe word and he ignored it, like was stated, then what?
I may not agree all the time with Rochard but on this point I couldn't agree more. No means no even if it replaced by a safe word.
The pathetic misogynist defenses of Deen's alleged actions in this thread, regardless of whether he is guilty or innocent, tell the truth about what a bunch of women hating troglodytes so many here really are. Disgusting.
Explain to your mom's and your daughters how no doesn't really mean no when it comes to sex.  |
you and rochard should get a pizza and talk about trucks.... lol
reread what i wrote, maybe 5x, or until you get it.
im not a woman hater at all.
what about a scenario when a person consents to sex acts that are fantasy rape with their partner?
that what seems to have been happening here.
do they then have the right to cry rape like a person who was beaten and forcibly raped by a criminal in the streets? is it the same thing?
i don't think so and its clearly stated deen and stoya are into that type of thing and she said she used her safe word, so clearly she consented to something that was RAPEY up until that point.
so the issue here is that he continued here past her "safe word" to stop the consensual fantasy rape that she wanted and agreed to, and now he's a rapist?
seems like weird logic/law to me.
i do not agree with that.
in other domestic cases i can totally see how a husband or ex could rape when a woman didn't consent but in a case where the woman consents to rape fantasy it seems flawed the she can later cry rape for it going a bit past what she asked for.
and , lets all totally ignore the big issue of if she has actually made a criminal report or is this just a twitter post.