Quote:
Originally Posted by American Psycho
you and rochard should get a pizza and talk about trucks.... lol
reread what i wrote, maybe 5x, or until you get it.
im not a woman hater at all.
what about a scenario when a person consents to sex acts that are fantasy rape with their partner?
that what seems to have been happening here.
do they then have the right to cry rape like a person who was beaten and forcibly raped by a criminal in the streets? is it the same thing?
i don't think so and its clearly stated deen and stoya are into that type of thing and she said she used her safe word, so clearly she consented to something that was RAPEY up until that point.
so the issue here is that he continued here past her "safe word" to stop the consensual fantasy rape that she wanted and agreed to, and now he's a rapist?
seems like weird logic/law to me.
i do not agree with that.
in other domestic cases i can totally see how a husband or ex could rape when a woman didn't consent but in a case where the woman consents to rape fantasy it seems flawed the she can later cry rape for it going a bit past what she asked for.
and , lets all totally ignore the big issue of if she has actually made a criminal report or is this just a twitter post.
|
You may not agree or understand the logic but that is entirely your own fault and lack of sensitivity to the issues. Understanding of why a SAFE WORD is critically important in those types of relationships, and comprehension of what it means to ignore a "NO" when that line is drawn is everything, couldn't agree more with Dyna Mo. You may see it as a "grey area" but being in this biz you should know better. The trust and security of having a safe word to help define that limit and boundary is 100% based on trust and acknowledgement so violating that trust is just black and white.
So to answer your question, yes, if there was a safe word that was ignored and something like rape or accidental death occurred then the person that did not heed the call and crossed the line is responsible.
This doesn't have to even be a "feminist" issue at all because the same principals would apply to even a same sex relationship.