Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmitry
If payment processing company charges 17% you would really receive only 3% but there are options for less commission.
|
There can be 10% or cheaper processing, sill you need like Epoch for alternative to CC things which is higher % and that's 9% of sales in best case; compare with 25%+ revshare... really, big affiliates i.e. tubes and programs, can negotiate this and I do know but I should not tell who, someone gets 40% revshare, of course on cam sites paying less than 50% to models. And the $250 PPS of imlive you see in ads of gfy skin right now. So no way a guy who simply wants a revshare income will pick your offer, these guys must want the start own cam site with own models.
I appreciate that you propose something new in cam market, given there's no news in years. New things however needs to find the exact market niche that is their target, and be understood by such target. I think I understood but simply because I run cam sites, I don't think this offer of yours it is truly understood by the typical webmaster, and they're not your target, this title "affiliates wanted! unique offer for webcam traffic" may be misleading if not reading and understanding your explanation.
Your target it is the guy who wants to launch the own cam site, without willing to risk the expensive total fail which happens to 95% of new cam sites launched. In fact your offer do have an unique value for such type of webcam startup cases, but, it should be understood and known by such webcam startuppers.
So this offer is not likely for webmasters, unless they are interested in setting up the own cam site for long term possibility of adding own models later. However there the question is, why such webcam startup should use your system? It looks like there will be 9% revshare of own cam site forever. I do suppose, that on the own models, there will be higher income, right? There is the long term advantage that justifies the short term 9% revshare after biller fee.
So let's make practical examples.
We have webm1, webm2 and webm3, all of which are sending signups to a cam program for a 25% revshare.
The webm1 keeps doing so forever, and makes 25% revshare forever.
The webm2 invests lots $$ to setup own cam site with own models from scratch, gets loss $XXX for software, then after paid models, makes anyway no more than 25%, still have to find models and pay back initial investment. Models quit his site after a day they signup because no members, and members quit the site because no models. That's what happens unless it is invested in first 6 months $500k in media buying and bonus for models (stay online hourly pay even if no sales) or better, $1M. This was discussed often in gfy and elsewhere and still people launch with $10k budget and fail every year
The webm3 picks dmitry solution, for hiscamsite com, with own design, and makes 9% instead of 25% he made with spectrecamprogram. Really, since hiscamsite got less models than spectrecamprogram, he also got less conversions and he makes like 3% if compared. Still, he also starts to search cam models to be added to his site. From these, he will get higher % (he will?). In long term, he will add more and more his own models to the dmitry provided ones, and he finally have own cam site with own models, without investing lots money and if he fails instead, he have not paid development of a dead cam system.
Now while webm2 is sure a loser, unless invested the $1M (in which case, he can still be a loser if he manage to fail the same), it is questionable if webm3 will have more success than webm1 in long term, since webm3 should end up getting more than 25% from own models, will he? Also, how locked will webm3 be with dmitry's policies? Let's say webm3 wants to pay models only 30% so he can get higher % for himself, or webm3 wants to start an affiliate program giving affiliates 20% himself, in other words, webm3 at some points wants to set all rules for his site using dmitry platform, can he?