Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Robbie:
The current gun law says that you can't buy a gun without a criminal background check. This sounds like a good law, right?
If this law is in place, why should people be able to get around it?
And why don't you think that this 1 tiny little step is a step in the right direction to maybe save at least 1 life?
|
Because it doesn't save at least one life.
It's a non-existent problem. I've already shown you the govt. stats. But you don't care. You're just gonna keep parroting what you've been told to think.
And what makes you think it's any kind of "step in the right direction"?
No, it's trying to circumvent the U.S. Constitution.
If we should all be disarmed to be "safe", then I have no problem with that.
I don't "need" a gun quite frankly.
So the Constitution should be amended. Just the way that Congress did when they found out that a Federal Income Tax was unconstitutional a little over a hundred years ago.
Instead of looking for loopholes to sneak in law that violates the Constitution, they simply added an amendment to it.
Same with Alchohol Prohibition.
That's all I'm saying: Instead of trying to chip away at our Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms...the proper way is to amend the Constitution.
I showed you that gun show purchased weapons are used in a tiny fraction of criminal activity. There are no stats showing that they have been used in killing anyone.
It's a made up "problem" that Obama is trying to "fix" by taking a tiny bit more or our freedoms.
As I said...maybe YOU are okay with that. I'm not.
As the song by The Fix went: "One thing...leads to another"