Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
2. I think the cops did plant or manipulate some evidence in order to make certain they made the case stick.
and....
|
There are many things I don't like about the Avery case, in particular:
That after around 9 searches, no DNA evidence of Teresa was found on the Avery property at any of the interior locations that were cited in the trial where Teresa was claimed to have been and certain acts committed.
Considering the acts that were claimed to have happened in these areas, blood spatters and fibers would have been 100% present, no question about it.
It's difficult to clean every DNA trace from a single knife due to nooks and crannies, even using bleach, let alone a whole home.
So, either Avery is the most meticulous DNA cleansing expert on the planet and can clean to zero trace, every singe hair strand and blood spot from a whole home and working garage that was chock full of heavy duty equipment and garage tools, or more likely, Teresa was never there.
Is one really meant to believe that an 80 IQ salvage yard worker has the capability to cleanse a messy home interior of every scrap of DNA but, instead of disposing of the other evidence in the same meticulous fashion - he deciders to simply leave the 4x4 on his own land, cover it in a tarp and a few branches, leave a few of his own DNA traces in the vehicle (but not on the key) and then to move the victims bones to within 20 feet of his own backdoor.
Lenk and cronies were up to something.