Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
I won't watch the show. I just happened to catch a long interview on Sirius where it started with "this guy is innocent...." and then an attorney came on very familiar with the case and broke down the entire fact pattern, along with the nature of the series itself (originally produced by the defense and not used, rights later bought by Netflix and then stretched out into a mini series). Anyway, after hearing the "here's a little about this guy and his history" followed by "these are the facts of the case" and then "this is what the documentary leaves out"... you can't possibly think "oh, this guy was set up"
|
Hearing about a police interview and seeing it are totally different. Manipulated or not it's one of the best "true crime" series I've ever seen.
How about the tampered blood vial?
How about the FBI blood test?
Bullet DNA test was contaminated and couldn't be retested.
Those are just some of many off the top of my head. I think he's guilty but there are some serious questions.. He wouldn't have been the first person to have ever been framed by the cops.