|
>gornyhuy.. i've never seen you before and you seem to have a
>lot of pro acacia posting under your belt.
One threads worth? Come on...
>Are you a moron? video "streaming" is not what their patents cover...
Can't defend myself there... I started my rant by saying I don't know much about the acacia patent specifically... I just get pissed off when I hear people say that just because a patent is broad reaching and fundamental that it is automatically invalidated somehow.
>Also. I hate to call you a moron again.
Why not, it makes you sound so intelligent, and your arguments so well thought out and logical.
>But i was personally downloading videos albeit short videos 10
>seconds long that looped in 1986 via my 1200 baud modem
>from a local BBS.
I was right there with you cranking my 300 baud C64 modem up to 450 and downloading the tiniest shittiest porn video ever made. Again, I don't know the full extent of the patent, but any proof of 'prior art' and 'obviousness' is exactly the kind of thing that could take acacia down. Bitching about it in general whiney terms and swearing revenge isn't going to do shit. Counter suing won't either. You have to work the system...
RANT MODE OFF.
I'm out.
__________________
icq:159548293
|