Quote:
Originally Posted by LovinNothin
He's not wearing boots. They are shoes.
|
Yeah, exactly!
The bloody foot print was made by the boot pictured in my post.
The prosecution claims OJ is wearing the boots in the other picture and he clearly is not.
This is the only proof the prosecution provided that OJ owned the boots.
There is no sales receipt or credit card charge and even the guy in the store doesn't know if
he ever sold a pair to OJ.
OJ was rich; it's an expensive shoe and that's where people got stuck.
There is no evidence that OJ ever owned those boots except that picture, which is clearly not the boots.
