I still don't understand why you people fail to read ALL of the language of safe harbor??
"This safe-harbor provision is found in section 512(c), and it states that, as the administrator of a website or other service, you will not be held liable for money damages for infringing content posted "at the direction of a user," as long as you
do not have actual knowledge that there is infringing content on your servers, or know any surrounding facts that would make the infringing use apparent;
do not receive any financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity if you have the ability to control such activity; and
act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the infringing material upon obtaining knowledge or awareness that the material is infringing or upon receiving a properly drafted notice of infringement (more below)."
What is enlarged above could be easily argued by any attorney.
How can you people keep talking about being protected when it clearly shows you aren't if you monitor every single video. Ignorance can be argued as defense but judges aren't stupid, jurors aren't stupid.
|