View Single Post
Old 02-09-2016, 05:40 AM  
Jel
Confirmed User
 
Jel's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgeyw View Post
I really do not see how any government can have the hide to keep the huge taxi license. A quick search show $220k in Sydney.

Then uber comes along and we have our PM supporting uber yet not even understandign why taxi drivers would be so angry about this.

I'm not a taxi or uber user, however even blind freddy can see why these guys would be so pissed about this.

The cab drivers in London have an amazing knowledge of the streets due to the training they undergo. How can uber suddenly undercut thiswithout having to adhere to any licensing laws or any vetting of drivers?
This. I can only go on the UK, but it's fucking amazing to me how people aren't seeing this. It's like seeing all the content producers, paysites, and so on moaning about torrents and tubes, where the overheads are cut drastically by not having to actually buy any content, and 1 billion surfers replying "fuck your monopoly, the market will decide".

Baffling.

My friend is a minicab driver - his car cannot be over 5 years old (may be 3, I can't recall offhand), he pays exorbitant insurance, had to pay $x,xxx to apply and receive his licence after criminal background checks, medicals, and so on. The gov't set the rates that the company he rents his radio equipment from charge passengers.

I have another few friends that are London black cab drivers, which is even stricter as far as passing exams for street knowledge, are tied in to rates set by the gov't to charge passengers.

All people see is 'cheaper!' and are way too quick to dismiss legit gripes by the drivers adhering to the govt's fees, laws, CRB checks, and so on. Y'know, kinda like surfers shouting 'the vids here are FREE though! If they can do it why can't all porn sites?'
Jel is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote